Advocates and reviewers will post their comments below. In addition, any IEEE member can sign in with their ETHW login (different from IEEE Single Sign On) and comment on the milestone proposal's accuracy or completeness as a form of public review.
-- Administrator4 (talk) 16:25, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[edit | reply | new]
In order to avoid the passive voice, to add details, and clarify that BASIC is no longer the principal programming language used on microcomputers, here is a suggested edit for the citation:
Professors John G. Kemeny and Thomas E. Kurtz at Dartmouth College designed the Beginner's All-purpose Symbolic Instruction Code (BASIC) programming language between 1963 and 1964. The simplicity of BASIC's syntax, and the wide acceptance of its enhanced versions, made it useful in fields beyond science and mathematics –- an early instance of “accessible computing.” During the mid-1970s and 1980s, BASIC was the principal programming language used on early microcomputers.
Citation use of names -- Lise Johnston (talk) 21:47, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[edit | reply | new]
It has generally been preferable to recognize the technical advancement without recognizing the individuals as the primary focus of milestone citations. The citation currently begins with the names of Professors John G. Kemeny and Thomas E. Kurtz at the beginning of the wording even before the achievement itself is enumerated. Consider revising the citation with that in mind. Maybe also describe what was special about BASIC in the plaque so the average viewing public who isn't familiar with it can better understand the significance of the achievement.
Incomplete application -- Lise Johnston (talk) 21:50, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[edit | reply | new]
Missing the section "What features set this work apart from similar achievements?"
Missing items -- Jason.k.hui (talk) 10:32, 4 September 2019 (UTC)[edit | reply | new]
It appears this milestone proposal did not have any expert reviews performed nor the advocate's approval recorded in the discussion area. Also, the intended plaque site as noted in the proposal is still incorrect. Based on my last email exchange with the milestone proposer in early July, the plaque will be installed on the west side of the south facade of Collis, the building formerly called College Hall. The proposal still has Kemeny Hall listed with the wrong photo.
History Committee Vice Chair & Milestone Subcommittee Chair
- Replace this text with your reply
I agree with Jason, we need the expert reviews. Generally, I am supportive of this milestone as it proceeds toward completion. Dave Bart
I second the comment of Dave. Also I agree with Lise, that the Citation does not reflect and does not explain the significance of this Milestone.
Table for next time? -- Allisonmarsh (talk) 06:13, 13 September 2019 (UTC)[edit | reply | new]
I am in general approval of the milestone, but thinks it needs finalization before being voted on by the HC.
Colleagues, I strongly support the "BASIC milestone" effort ... of course, you must realize that I'm in the category of students identified by Dykstra when he asserted "It is practically impossible to teach good programming to students that have had a prior exposure to BASIC: as potential programmers they are mentally mutilated beyond hope of regeneration” Perhaps some regeneration has occurred subsequent to my first use of the language on an HP system in 1967. [Also note, as Vice Chair of the NH Section I've been an advocate of this for some time.]
1) Is the suggested wording of the Plaque Citation accurate?
-- Yes, perhaps it understates the real impact of BASIC since it was a significant component of both Apple and Microsoft's emergence in the market.
2) Is the evidence presented in the proposal of sufficient substance and accuracy to support the Citation?
-- Yes, I hope that Dartmouth, and others keep the description provided in places where future students and such can
reference this. In a world of smart phones that out-compute the largest computers of the last century, and languages
like Python (which is an interpretive language, with some inspiration from BASIC) have facilitated the explosion of \
data science, analytics, and deep learning ... it is easy to forget how BASIC translated a box of silicon tied to a
TV set into a device that millions of users could both use, but also actually learn to program. A standard test applied by myself and others to any new personal computer was to enter a simple BASIC program to add the
numbers from one to a thousand just to verify that it worked, was easy to use and reasonably fast.
3) Does the proposed milestone represent a significant technical achievement?
absolutely. there is really no alternative with similar impact. IBM's APL was also
an interpretive language that supported multi-user systems, but it was literally Greek
to most of it's few users. Small computers (Mini's/Micros) were programmed in assembly
code which was even more likely to 'mentally mutilate' students (myself included)
The addition to BASIC of peek/poke (to directly manipulate RAM contents), made it
an essential tool for hackers (both in the positive use of the term - folks who create
quick and dirty applications; and the negative sense -- folks that do nasty things to your
computer.) ... Microsoft's continued evolution of BASIC as a core part of their office tools,
(it's the macro coding tool), into Visual Basic and also a web-server side programming
environment, added the critical structured programming components that Dykstra
was advocating (proper loops and the elimination of "GOTO" being key examples.)
BASIC put programming in the hands of millions of non-computer science folks,
something that cannot be said for any other computing language.
Expert Review ..cont.. Jim Isaak -- E.tejera (talk) 16:13, 25 September 2019 (UTC)[edit | reply | new]
I should also point out that the Computer Society honored BASIC's creators as "Computing Pioneers" with their major award in this area: 1991 Thomas E. Kurtz For BASIC 1985 John G. Kemeny For BASIC so my perspective is shared by others in the Society with respect to the value of this contribution