Difference between revisions of "Milestone-Proposal talk:"Mother of All Demos""

From IEEE Milestones Wiki
(The Milestone name is meaningless)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
-> DB; The term 'Mother of all demos', in Australian venacular implies a disaster, and does not tell me anything. A name change is recomemnded to be meaningful.
 
-> DB; The term 'Mother of all demos', in Australian venacular implies a disaster, and does not tell me anything. A name change is recomemnded to be meaningful.
 +
 +
===Re: The first question in the proposal is not answered. -- [[User:Administrator4|Administrator4]] ([[User talk:Administrator4|talk]]) 10:16, 2 March 2016 (CST)===
 +
 +
The question was added to the milestone proposal mechanism (at History Committee request) after this proposal was submitted. It will be useful going forward but should not be applied ex post facto

Revision as of 16:16, 2 March 2016

Name and Citation -- Djkemp (talk) 07:52, 31 January 2016 (CST)[edit | reply | new]

To the general public (and others), the "Mother" aspect of the title is not descriptive of the milestone. The use of "mother: in the citation should be more apparent if it is to be used.

The first question in the proposal is not answered. -- Djkemp (talk) 07:17, 27 February 2016 (CST)[edit | reply | new]

See the question about litigation in the proposal.

Re: The first question in the proposal is not answered. -- k3hz (talk) 21:43, 29 February 2016 (CST)[edit | reply | new]

-> DB; The term 'Mother of all demos', in Australian venacular implies a disaster, and does not tell me anything. A name change is recomemnded to be meaningful.

Re: The first question in the proposal is not answered. -- Administrator4 (talk) 10:16, 2 March 2016 (CST)[edit | reply | new]

The question was added to the milestone proposal mechanism (at History Committee request) after this proposal was submitted. It will be useful going forward but should not be applied ex post facto