Difference between revisions of "Milestone-Proposal talk:"Mother of All Demos""

From IEEE Milestones Wiki
(The Milestone name is meaningless)
Line 6: Line 6:
  
 
See the question about litigation in the proposal.
 
See the question about litigation in the proposal.
 +
 +
===Re: The first question in the proposal is not answered. -- [[User:K3hz|k3hz]] ([[User talk:K3hz|talk]]) 21:43, 29 February 2016 (CST)===
 +
 +
-> DB; The term 'Mother of all demos', in Australian venacular implies a disaster, and does not tell me anything. A name change is recomemnded to be meaningful.

Revision as of 03:43, 1 March 2016

Name and Citation -- Djkemp (talk) 07:52, 31 January 2016 (CST)[edit | reply | new]

To the general public (and others), the "Mother" aspect of the title is not descriptive of the milestone. The use of "mother: in the citation should be more apparent if it is to be used.

The first question in the proposal is not answered. -- Djkemp (talk) 07:17, 27 February 2016 (CST)[edit | reply | new]

See the question about litigation in the proposal.

Re: The first question in the proposal is not answered. -- k3hz (talk) 21:43, 29 February 2016 (CST)[edit | reply | new]

-> DB; The term 'Mother of all demos', in Australian venacular implies a disaster, and does not tell me anything. A name change is recomemnded to be meaningful.