Difference between revisions of "Milestone-Proposal talk:AFIS NEC"

(Citation word change? -- ~~~~: new section)
(Accuracy of fingerprint identification -- ~~~~: new section)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
I would suggest changing the word “criminals” to “suspects” in the last sentence and rephrasing to avoid vague passive voice:
 
I would suggest changing the word “criminals” to “suspects” in the last sentence and rephrasing to avoid vague passive voice:
 
It enabled the world's police agencies to expedite searches for suspects, an efficiency that many public-safety experts valued.
 
It enabled the world's police agencies to expedite searches for suspects, an efficiency that many public-safety experts valued.
 +
 +
== Accuracy of fingerprint identification -- [[User:CSchlombs|CSchlombs]] ([[User talk:CSchlombs|talk]]) 03:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC) ==
 +
 +
The accuracy of fingerprint identification has been called into question in recent years by studies of the National Academy of Sciences, the President's Councils of Advisors on Science and Technology, and others, for example:
 +
 +
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3093498/
 +
https://wordpress.jmcgowan.com/wp/the-accuracy-of-fingerprint-identification-in-criminal-cases/
 +
https://www.aaas.org/news/fingerprint-source-identity-lacks-scientific-basis-legal-certainty
 +
 +
Should this debate be taken into consideration in the formulation of the plaque citation, or at least be mentioned in the ETHW information?

Revision as of 03:09, 10 March 2019

Advocate's comments (posted on advocate's behalf by -- Administrator4 (talk) 14:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)

I have reviewed this proposal and have also done some in depth consultation discussions with image processing experts in the industry and academia that I had the opportunity to work with. And we agree that this effort deserves the recognition.

A few notes - this accomplishment is about building a high accuracy and a high utility system rather than a breakthrough invention of some fundamental technique or concept. So it is s little different from other milestones that typically recognize seminal efforts that later manifest into major fields of technology. The social impact of this milestone is huge - it enabled better crime solving and assisted in solving a few marqueee crime cases in the history such as LA’s Night Stalker.

Re: Advocate's comments (posted on advocate's behalf by -- Jason.k.hui (talk) 17:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)

As part of the Milestone process, please have two experts provide their reviews and approval of the Milestone in this forum. It is important that we have this documented.

Jason

Milestone Subcommittee Chair

Citation word change? -- Amy Bix (talk) 02:29, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

I would suggest changing the word “criminals” to “suspects” in the last sentence and rephrasing to avoid vague passive voice: It enabled the world's police agencies to expedite searches for suspects, an efficiency that many public-safety experts valued.

Accuracy of fingerprint identification -- CSchlombs (talk) 03:09, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

The accuracy of fingerprint identification has been called into question in recent years by studies of the National Academy of Sciences, the President's Councils of Advisors on Science and Technology, and others, for example:

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3093498/ https://wordpress.jmcgowan.com/wp/the-accuracy-of-fingerprint-identification-in-criminal-cases/ https://www.aaas.org/news/fingerprint-source-identity-lacks-scientific-basis-legal-certainty

Should this debate be taken into consideration in the formulation of the plaque citation, or at least be mentioned in the ETHW information?