Milestone-Proposal talk:SCR/Thyristor: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 17:14, 22 August 2018

-- Juan Carlos (talk) 17:20, 9 April 2018 (UTC)

As advocate, in my opinion the proposal looks good, and the application of SCr's in Power Electronics undoubtedly had a major impact in the whole world. An open issue is where to mount the plaque, as the original building seems neither available nor much significant in the whole process of development, introduction and manufacture of SCR's by GE. It would be useful to the Committee if the proposers elaborate in the argumentation why Schnectady and in particular the Museum is appropriate.

Re: -- Wghurley (talk) 10:38, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Replace this text with your reply

Dear Juan, I have received approval from AA Technologies to mount the plaque on the outside of the building and I have received permission from the Rochester Section to host the plaque in their section.

I cannot access the proposal to update the changes, perhaps you can guide me on that.

@@ Line 2: / Line 2: @@
 As advocate, in my opinion the proposal looks good, and the application of SCr's in Power Electronics undoubtedly had a major impact in the whole world.
-An open issue is where to mount the plaque, as the original building is neither available nor  much significant in the whole process of development, introduction and manufacture of SCR's by GE.
+An open issue is where to mount the plaque, as the original building seems neither available nor  much significant in the whole process of development, introduction and manufacture of SCR's by GE.
-It would be useful to the Committee if the proposers elaborate in the argumentation why Schnectady and in particular the Museum are appropriate.
+It would be useful to the Committee if the proposers elaborate in the argumentation why Schnectady and in particular the Museum is appropriate.
 ===Re: -- [[User:Wghurley|Wghurley]] ([[User talk:Wghurley|talk]]) 10:38, 31 July 2018 (UTC)===