Difference between revisions of "Milestone-Proposal talk:Object-oriented programming"

(Edits to citation -- ~~~~: new section)
(Possible addition to supplemental documents -- ~~~~: new section)
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
"When Ole-Johan Dahl and Kristen Nygaard created the Simula languages in the 1960s at the Norwegian Computing Center, they introduced a new way of modeling and programming complex tasks. Object-oriented programming is now dominant in system development.  It is an integral part of the computer science curricula, as are languages built on object-oriented programming concepts, such as Smalltalk, C++, and Java."
 
"When Ole-Johan Dahl and Kristen Nygaard created the Simula languages in the 1960s at the Norwegian Computing Center, they introduced a new way of modeling and programming complex tasks. Object-oriented programming is now dominant in system development.  It is an integral part of the computer science curricula, as are languages built on object-oriented programming concepts, such as Smalltalk, C++, and Java."
 +
 +
== Possible addition to supplemental documents -- [[User:Allisonmarsh|Allisonmarsh]] ([[User talk:Allisonmarsh|talk]]) 00:46, 25 January 2017 (UTC) ==
 +
 +
I have no objection to this citation, but I observe that the wikipedia history of oop lists initial work at MIT.  Is this worth addressing in the supplemental information that goes on the ETHW as part of the milestone record?  I don't want some MIT engineers to start claiming priority.

Revision as of 00:46, 25 January 2017

Dette er jo en test -- Knuthe (talk) 07:44, 26 September 2016 (CDT)

Hvor kommer dette inn i forslaget?


Test

Bjarte: foo bar baz test

Edits to citation -- Allisonmarsh (talk) 00:42, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

I propose breaking up the complex second sentence into two shorter sentences for ease of reading.

"When Ole-Johan Dahl and Kristen Nygaard created the Simula languages in the 1960s at the Norwegian Computing Center, they introduced a new way of modeling and programming complex tasks. Object-oriented programming is now dominant in system development. It is an integral part of the computer science curricula, as are languages built on object-oriented programming concepts, such as Smalltalk, C++, and Java."

Possible addition to supplemental documents -- Allisonmarsh (talk) 00:46, 25 January 2017 (UTC)

I have no objection to this citation, but I observe that the wikipedia history of oop lists initial work at MIT. Is this worth addressing in the supplemental information that goes on the ETHW as part of the milestone record? I don't want some MIT engineers to start claiming priority.