Difference between revisions of "Milestone-Proposal talk:Nobeyama 45-m Telescope"

(Approval support -- ~~~~: new section)
(Approval support -- Djkemp (talk) 20:49, 2 June 2016 (CDT))
 
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
I support this proposal as an IEEE Milestone.
 
I support this proposal as an IEEE Milestone.
 +
 +
===Re: Approval support -- [[User:Allisonmarsh|Allisonmarsh]] ([[User talk:Allisonmarsh|talk]]) 13:14, 3 June 2016 (CDT)===
 +
 +
I support it as well.

Latest revision as of 18:14, 3 June 2016

Advocate Comment [DB 3 May2016] -- k3hz (talk) 20:39, 2 May 2016 (CDT)

Having reviewed the milestone submission in detail and checked key references, all aspects of this Milestone submission look to be valid and intact, and no evidence that any litigation is related to this claim. I therefore propose this Milestone be elevated for review and acceptance by the History Committee at its next meeting/teleconference. Yours faithfully, David Burger Sydney, Australia.

Approval support -- Djkemp (talk) 20:49, 2 June 2016 (CDT)

I support this proposal as an IEEE Milestone.

Re: Approval support -- Allisonmarsh (talk) 13:14, 3 June 2016 (CDT)

I support it as well.