Milestone-Proposal talk:AFIS NEC: Difference between revisions
Jason.k.hui (talk | contribs) |
Jason.k.hui (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Jason | Jason | ||
Milestone Subcommittee Chair | Milestone Subcommittee Chair | ||
Revision as of 17:18, 23 February 2019
Advocate's comments (posted on advocate's behalf by -- Administrator4 (talk) 14:09, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
I have reviewed this proposal and have also done some in depth consultation discussions with image processing experts in the industry and academia that I had the opportunity to work with. And we agree that this effort deserves the recognition.
A few notes - this accomplishment is about building a high accuracy and a high utility system rather than a breakthrough invention of some fundamental technique or concept. So it is s little different from other milestones that typically recognize seminal efforts that later manifest into major fields of technology. The social impact of this milestone is huge - it enabled better crime solving and assisted in solving a few marqueee crime cases in the history such as LA’s Night Stalker.
Re: Advocate's comments (posted on advocate's behalf by -- Jason.k.hui (talk) 17:17, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
As part of the Milestone process, please have two experts provide their reviews and approval of the Milestone in this forum. It is important that we have this documented.
Jason
Milestone Subcommittee Chair
