Edit Proposal: Milestone-Proposal:Perpendicular Magnetic Recording You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason: You are not currently logged in. The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users. Please log in or create an account. Docket ID: (admins only) Thank you for proposing a technical achievement for possible recognition as an IEEE Milestone in Electrical Engineering and Computing. Your efforts help preserve the heritage of technology. Detailed information on the Milestone application process may be found at: Milestone Guidelines and How to Propose a Milestone. At least one of the proposer(s) must be an IEEE Member (including Student Member) in good standing. To the proposer’s knowledge, is this achievement subject to litigation? If the answer is "yes", the proposal cannot proceed further. Yes No You must be able to answer "yes" to all of the following questions. If the answer to any of the following questions is "no", the proposal cannot proceed further. Contact us at email@example.com if you are unable to answer "yes" to all of the following and would still like to proceed. Is the achievement you are proposing more than 25 years old? Yes No Is the achievement you are proposing within IEEE’s designated fields as defined by IEEE Bylaw I-104.11, namely: Engineering, Computer Sciences and Information Technology, Physical Sciences, Biological and Medical Sciences, Mathematics, Technical Communications, Education, Management, and Law and Policy. Yes No Did the achievement provide a meaningful benefit for humanity? Yes No Was it of at least regional importance? Yes No Has an IEEE Organizational Unit agreed to pay for the milestone plaque(s)? Yes No Has an IEEE Organizational Unit agreed to arrange the dedication ceremony? Yes No Has the IEEE Section in which the milestone is located agreed to take responsibility for the plaque after it is dedicated? Yes No Has the owner of the site given permission to place an IEEE plaque? Yes No Year or range of years in which the achievement occurred: Title of the proposed milestone. (Include date or date range in title. Example: “Alternating Current Electrification, 1886”) Please provide a plaque citation in English summarizing the achievement and its significance. Text absolutely limited by plaque dimensions to 70 words; 60 is preferable for aesthetic reasons. NOTE: The IEEE History Committee shall have final determination on the wording of the citation. Names of living persons are not normally used in citations. Exceptions to this are cases where the person's name is linked to the achievement itself (e.g. the Lempel-Ziv algorithm, Maxwell's Equations, etc.) or where the person's name is so widely recognizeable to the general public that it makes sense to use it. When used, the names should be the names of the engineers, scientists, or technologists who actually made the achievement, rather than managers or executives. For more information and suggestions about writing milestone citations, please visit Helpful Hints on Citations, Plaque Locations. In 1977, perpendicular magnetic recording was invented by Professor Shun-ichi Iwasaki of Tohoku University. The development of perpendicular recording media and the single-pole head made the most of magnetic physics to demonstrate the significant high-density recording performance. Since the first commercialization of perpendicular magnetic recording hard disk drives in 2005, the data storage technology utilizing perpendicular magnetic recording has established the foundation of “big data” information society. In what IEEE section(s) will the milestone plaque(s) reside? Please specify the IEEE Organizational Unit(s) which have agreed to sponsor the Milestone, and supply name and contact information for the senior officer from those OU(s). Sponsorship has three aspects: 1) Payment for the cost of the plaque(s), 2) Arranging the dedication ceremony, and 3) agreeing to monitor the plaque and to let IEEE History Center staff know in case the plaque needs to be moved, is no longer secure, etc. Number 3 must be done by the IEEE Section(s) in which the plaque(s) is located, but aspects 1 and 2 can be done by any IEEE Organizational Unit, and they need not be the same one. Please note: your email address and contact information will be masked on the website for privacy reasons. Only IEEE History Center Staff will be able to view the email address. IEEE Organizational Unit(s) paying for milestone plaque(s) Unit: Senior Officer Name: E-mail: Unit: Senior Officer Name: E-mail: IEEE Organizational Unit(s) arranging the dedication ceremony Unit: Senior Officer Name: E-mail: Unit: Senior Officer Name: E-mail: IEEE section(s) monitoring the plaque IEEE Section: IEEE Section Chair name: IEEE Section Chair e-mail: IEEE Section: IEEE Section Chair name: IEEE Section Chair e-mail: Milestone proposer(s) Proposer name: Proposer email: Proposer name: Proposer email: Street address(es) and GPS coordinates of the intended milestone plaque site(s). Please include coordinates in decimal format rather than degrees. What is the intended site(s) of the milestone plaque(s) relation to the achievement? The intended site(s) must have a direct connection with the achievement (e.g. where developed, invented, tested, demonstrated, installed, or operated, etc.). A museum where a device or example of the technology is displayed, or the university where the inventor studied, are not, in themselves, sufficient connection for a milestone plaque. Also, please Describe briefly the intended site(s) of the milestone plaque(s). (e.g. Is it corporate buildings? Historic Site? Residential? Are there other historical markers already at the site?) Are the original buildings extant? Please provide the details of the mounting, i.e. on the outside of the building, in the ground floor entrance hall, on a plinth on the grounds, etc. How is the intended plaque site protected/secured, and in what ways is it accessible to the public? If visitors to the plaque site will need to go through security, or make an appointment, please give details as well as the contact information visitors will need in order to arrange to visit the plaque. Who is the present owner of the site(s)? In the space below, please describe in detail: the historic significance of the achievement, its importance to the evolution of electrical and computer engineering and science, its importance to regional/national/international development, its benefits to humanity, the ways the achievement was a significant advance rather than an incremental improvement of existing technology. The material submitted here will constitute the main descriptive article on the ETHW website for readers to learn about the milestone. Space is unlimited, and detail is encouraged. Most milestones require 1000 to 1500 words of support, however there is no word limit. The article should be readable by a wide audience that includes practicing engineers, scholars of history, and the general public. Some examples of the text of good milestone articles are First Radio Astronomical Observations Using Very Long Baseline Interferometry] and G3_Facsimile International Standardization of G3 Facsimile (Do not worry about the formatting of the page, IEEE History Center Staff will do that afterwards.) What is the historical significance of the work (its technological, scientific, or social importance)? The most important significance is that perpendicular magnetic recording (PMR) opened a new paradigm of high areal density magnetic recording. PMR is the original invention by Professor Dr. Shun-ichi Iwasaki, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan, in 1977 . It is one of the most fundamental innovations in magnetic recording history, which has realized large-capacity storage technology which is indispensable for the present “big data” society. The significance of PMR is recognized as scientific, industrial, and social aspects. Innovation of high density magnetic recording PMR achieved high areal density recording by aligning the recorded magnetization perpendicular to the medium surface. Prior to PMR in longitudinal magnetic recording, recorded magnetization was oriented in-plain, or parallel to the surface. The contrast is schematically shown in Fig. 1, where the bit length corresponds to the length of each magnetization, or magnet, bearing one bit. At low densities, the recorded longitudinal magnetization is stable, because the demagnetization field is small. In contrast, at high densities, short bit lengths induce a large demagnetization field in the recorded bits that destabilizes the recorded magnetization. To avoid this difficulty, the recording medium should be made thinner, but in that case, the small bit volume made readout signals too small to detect without read-errors. PMR fundamentally changed this situation by changing the direction of the recorded magnetization. As indicated in the figure, anti-parallel magnetization states are formed in PMR, which reduces the demagnetization field at short bit lengths, or high linear densities. The first scientific significance is to realize this complementary nature of magneto-static energy in the recording medium . Because of the superior high density performance, PMR was recognized as the next generation disk technology even in the 1980s . [[File:fig1.gif]] Fig. 1 Magnetization in the medium in perpendicular magnetic recording and conventional longitudinal recording. Three key devices were newly developed to realize PMR: the discovery of cobalt-chrome (Co-Cr) thin films , the development of a perpendicular writing head that generated a dominant perpendicular field, referred to as a shingle-pole head in 1978  and the invention of double-layer media, which significantly enhanced the head field strength . Fig. 2 schematically illustrates the head and medium structure of PMR (right) compared with longitudinal recording (left). In order to realize high areal density PMR, both Co-Cr perpendicular anisotropy medium and a single-pole writing head with a soft magnetic underlayer are indispensable. It should be stressed that, without the perpendicular anisotropy medium, stable perpendicular magnetization cannot be maintained, as was widely recognized . Fig. 3 shows magnetic characteristics, hysteresis loops, of the Co-Cr films developed in 1978 . The square solid curves for a perpendicularly applied field indicated strong perpendicular anisotropy, while the thin loops for in-plain field demonstrate good perpendicular orientation. The single-pole head generates the dominant perpendicular field that penetrates the medium. The soft-magnetic underlayer of the medium enhances the writing field strength and gradient by the magnetic image effect. Fig. 4 shows an early single-pole head developed for tape recording experiments in late 1970s. These media and heads developed in the early stages were used to study the fundamental performance of PMR. The experimental setup of write and read operation with a perpendicular flexible disk and a single-pole head was accomplished, as shown in Fig. 5. Spin-stand testing, which is a kind of practical experiment, was carried out with a Co-Cr flexible disk and a single-pole head before 1980. [[File:fig2.gif]] Fig. 2 Structure of writing and reading heads and recording medium in perpendicular magnetic recording (right) and conventional longitudinal recording (left). [[File:fig3.gif]] Fig.3 Magnetic characteristics of Co-Cr perpendicular anisotropy films. Solid line: perpendicular applied field, broken line: in-plain applied field. [[File:fig4.gif]] Fig. 4 Early single-pole perpendicular head developed for tape recording experiments. [[File:fig5.gif]] Fig. 5 Spin-stand testing for integrated write and read PMR experiments in 1980s. In high areal density recording, another physical difficulty appeared in longitudinal recording, which was the thermal stability limit. Thermal energy at room temperature randomly disturbs the recorded magnetization, which causes probabilistic magnetization reversal. Because of these random reversals, the recorded information may randomly disappear, and therefore, is “forgotten”. The thermal stability is governed by the ratio of magnetic energy and thermal energy. The magnetic energy is defined as the product of the magnetic anisotropy energy and the bit volume. This is the reason why thermal agitation is more severe at higher areal densities, or smaller bit volumes. PMR can employ a thick medium, in which the bit volume can be much larger than in longitudinal recording. The strong writing field of the single-pole head with the soft magnetic underlayer allows a high anisotropy medium to be used. PMR thus largely extends the physical limit imposed by the thermal disturbance. So far, the superior areal density capability of PMR achieved almost tenfold greater density in experiments. The countermeasure against the thermal stability limit is another important significance. Developments of new recording technologies are ongoing to achieve further high areal densities for the next generation. It is clear that the direction of recorded magnetization will be perpendicular, without exception. PMR is the basic technology even for future recording systems. Industrial significance Because of the large production volume of HDD, PMR’s industrial impact is significant. The magnetic recording industry has had a great interest in PMR since right after the first paper was published in 1977. During the 1980s intensive research and development by the magnetic recording industry was keenly carried out as joint research organized by Prof. Iwasaki . Although there was a long halt during the 1990s, the industry resumed development around 2000. A prototype of a PMR hard disk drive (HDD) was demonstrated at IEEE Intermag conference 2000 by Hitachi Ltd and Tohoku University , . Eventually the first PMR 1.8-inch hard disk drive for portable music player was commercialized in 2005 by Toshiba Corp, followed by Hitachi and Seagate Technology, and others , , . By 2010, all hard disk drive production with conventional recording had been replaced by PMR. Fig. 6 shows the shipments of hard disk drives . Worldwide shipments of PMR hard disk drives reached 600 million units in 2013 bringing a big revenue to the industry. Thus, PMR had a big impact on industry, with the vast shipment of the hard disk drives and related products. [[File:fig6.gif]] Fig. 6 Shipment of perpendicular and longitudinal hard disk drives . Dramatic transition took place after the first shipment in 2005. PMR has also encouraged spin-offs of industrial applications for other technologies. All reading heads for PMR HDDs were giant magneto-resistive heads, which are based on spintronics. Individual HDDs are equipped with multiple reading heads, which provides the largest market for the spintronics technology. Besides, the large information storage capacity of PMR has pushed the market growth of information technology (IT), such as cloud storage and large-scale data centers where vast amount of HDDs are used. The market size of this segment is huge, to which PMR contributes with its “big data” storage technology. Contribution to IT technology and information society For audio/video and computers such as home electronics applications, medical equipment, automobile applications PMR is indispensable, but a more significant application is big-data information storage technologies , , as shown in Fig. 7. In particular, in the recent information society, the amount of generated information is extremely large and rapidly increasing, approximately twofold every two years . The worldwide amount of generated digital information became the gigantic amount of 16 zetta bytes in 2017 . This tremendous growth of “big data” causes a strong demand of large capacity information storage for data centers, cloud computing, and information servers. HDD is widely used as the dominant storage device in networks and computers to store most of information. As is commonly recognized, the high areal density capability achieved by PMR is an indispensable asset for big data. The areal density on a disk is the most crucial figure of merit in such applications. The innovation of PMR has dramatically increased the storage capacity of HDDs for personal computers and data servers. Both have satisfied the big demand for large storage capacity along with inexpensive bit cost. PMR thus accelerated the development of storage technologies for modern information technology, which is another industrial significance to provide novel, big data technology for the next-generation information society. [[File:fig7.gif]] Fig. 7 Wide applications of hard disk drives form the infrastructure of information society civilization. [[File:fig8.gif]] Fig. 8 A major Japanese newspaper, Asahi Shimbun, reported commercialization of PMR for HDD. The heading reads “Perpendicular recording is commercialized. Ten-fold capacity possible. Thirty-year-long research for hard disk drive technology from Japan.” The translation in English is described in reference . Honors and Awards The significance of this work can also be measured by the honors that have been given to Prof. Iwasaki directly in recognition of the outstanding technological contribution of PMR. In chronological order, he received IEEE Fellow (1984), Japan Academy Prize (1987), IEEE Cledo Brunetti Award (1989), IEEE Magnetics Society Achievement Award (2002), Admission of the Japan Academy (2003), Japan Prize (2010), Benjamin Franklin Medal (2014), and The Order of Cultural Merit (2013). They are all awarded for outstanding contributions, not only for engineering achievements, but also for the significant impact on social activities. What obstacles (technical, political, geographic) needed to be overcome? The most significant obstacle that had to be overcome was the deep gap between scientific accomplishment and industrial success . After the success of the first experimental demonstration and the first paper publication in 1977, the commercialization of PMR was 28 years later in 2005. It took long time for the technology to be brought to the market. PMR actually encountered a “death valley” during the 1990s. The major reason was competition with conventional longitudinal recording. Areal density growth of conventional recording continued even in the 1990s. Many technical difficulties arose when recording extremely small bits and reading information from the tiny areas of magnetization, but highly sensitive read heads and new signal processing techniques made longitudinal recording survive longer. Industries tend to stick to conventional technology, unless it cannot meet the required performance. However, a new brick wall obstructed the way after the year of 2000. The thermal stability limit blocked the areal density growth of longitudinal magnetic recording. Although PMR had to wait until 2005, it eventually became the front runner. A Japanese major newspaper reported the commercialization of PMR on May 21, 2005, as shown in Fig. 8 and its translation in ref. . The heading reads “Perpendicular recording is commercialized. Tenfold capacity possible. Thirty-year-long research into hard disk technology from Japan.”. The second reason was the big technology leap required for the innovative development of PMR. Whole recording devices, e.g. heads, media, and signal processing, needed to be newly developed in order to be industrialized. The medium was totally changed from conventional iron-oxide longitudinal media to Co-Cr based thin film perpendicular media. Because perpendicular anisotropy media were first usede in PMR, time-consuming, careful studies on the magnetic characteristics, microstructure, and reliability were indispensable to develop practical disks for PMR. The same situation applied to the single-pole head, which had to be newly developed to replace conventional ring heads. The prototype start with the heads for tape recording as shown in Fig. 4, and a flying head for HDDs, fabricated by thin-film technology was finally demonstrated, as shown in ref . There was a fundamental structural change. Besides, the fundamental recording theorem of PMR was established during that period. What features set this work apart from similar achievements? In longitudinal recording, areal density growth was attained according to the design concept of the “scaling rule”. In order to attain high areal density recording, the bit length and track width of the recorded magnetization should be proportionally scaled down. The scaling rule tells us that all related parameters should be proportionally reduced in order to maintain the aspect ratio of the recorded bits, for example, the thickness of medium, head to medium separation (or magnetic spacing), writing head field gradient, and reading head resolution. As previously mentioned, the demagnetization fields in perpendicular and conventional longitudinal recording are in contrast: in longitudinal recording short bit length magnetization induces a large demagnetizing field that tends to destabilize the magnetization. The scaling rule therefore suggested a flat and small bit, keeping the same aspect ratio of bit length to medium thickness. This scaling design rule, however, has an inevitable drawback, which was a decrease of the magnetic moments per bit due to the reduction of the total bit volume. This was the reason why conventional longitudinal magnetic recording required a very sensitive reading head, such as giant magneto-resistive head. PMR was the first accomplishment, which did not obey the scaling rule by using magnetization perpendicular to the medium surface. The next unavoidable physical limit showed up when the areal density was beyond the “thermal stability” limit. Any recorded magnetization cannot avoid the disturbance of room temperature thermal energy. The recorded magnetization suffers from random fluctuations, which can accidentally cause grain magnetization switching. To resist thermal fluctuations individual recorded bits need to have a sufficient magnetic energy, which is proportional to the bit volume. Obviously, the scaling rule cannot prevent the reduction of the bit volume. The principle of complementarity between longitudinal and perpendicular magnetic recording allows a breakthrough of the dilemma. For example, the thickness of the perpendicular magnetic recording medium can be thick to decrease the demagnetizing field. The magnetic energy of a bit, KuV, where Ku and V are the anisotropy energy and bit volume, of the perpendicular recording medium can be larger than the thin longitudinal recording medium. After being introduced to the market, perpendicular magnetic recording achieved tenfold areal density growth in comparison with the maximum areal density of past longitudinal recording. Such large areal density is the essential significance of PMR. Supporting texts and citations to establish the dates, location, and importance of the achievement. You must supply the texts or excerpts themselves, not just the references. Minimum of five (5), but as many as needed to support the milestone, such as patents, contemporary newspaper articles, journal articles, or chapters in scholarly books. At least one of the references must be from a scholarly book or journal article. 'Scholarly' is defined as peer-reviewed, with references, and published. The full reference, in English, must be uploaded, not just the citation. See below section for details on uploading material to the website. All supporting materials must be in English, or accompanied by an English translation. The following references have been uploaded as PDFs. The reference number is at the front of the file name. . Shun-ichi Iwasaki and Yoshihisa Nakamura, “An Analysis for the magnetization mode for high density magnetic recording,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-13, no. 5, pp. 1272-1277, Sep. 1977. [[File:1_Iwasaki_1977.pdf]] . Shun-ichi Iwasaki and Yoshihisa Nakamura, “The magnetic field distribution of a perpendicular recording head,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-14, no. 5, pp. 436-438, Sep. 1978. [[File:2_Iwasaki_1978.pdf]] . Shun-ichi Iwasaki and Kazuhiro Ouchi, “Co-Cr recording films with perpendicular magnetic anisotropy,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-14, no. 5, pp. 849-851, Sep. 1978. [[File:3_Iwasaki_1978.pdf]] . Shun-ichi Iwasaki, Yoshihisa Nakamura, and Kazuhiro Ouchi, “Perpendicular magnetic recording with a composite anisotropy film,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-15, no. 6, pp. 1456-1458, Nov. 1979. [[File:4_Iwasaki_1979.pdf]] . Shun-ichi Iwasaki, “Perpendicular magnetic recording,” IEEE Trans. Magn., vol. MAG-16, no. 1, pp.71-76, Jan. 1980. [[File:5_Iwasaki_1980.pdf]] . C. S. Chi, “Higher density for disk memories,” IEEE Spectrum, p. 39, March 1981. [[File:6_Chi_1981_spectrum.pdf]] . C. Denis Mee and Eric. D. Daniel, “Magnetic Recording Volume I Technology” McGraw Hill, p. 19, 1987. (early attempt failed. Situation changed by CoCr media) [[File:7_Mee&Daniel_1987.pdf]] . Hisashi Takano, Yasutaka Nishida, Masaaki Futamoto, Hajime Aoi, Yoshihisa Nakamura, “Possibilities of 40 Gb/in2 perpendicular recording,” Digest of the 2000 IEEE International Magnetics Conference, AD-06, Apr. 2000. [[File:8_Takano_2000.pdf]] . Hisashi Takano, Yasutaka Nishida, Atsuko Kuroda, Hideki Sawaguchi, Yuzuru Hosoe, Takashi Kawabe, Hajime Aoi, Hiroaki Muraoka, Yoshihisa Nakamura, Kazuhiro Ouchi, “Realization of 52.5 Gb/in2 perpendicular recording,” J. Magn. Magn. Mater., vol. 235, pp. 241-244, 2001. [[File:9_Takano_2001.pdf]] . On-line announcement of shipment of perpendicular recording hard disk drives by Toshiba Corporation. http://www.toshiba.co.jp/about/press/2004_12/pr1401.htm [[File:10_Toshiba_Press_Releases_14_December_2004.pdf]] . Newspaper article, Asahi Shimbun May 21, 2005. “’Perpendicular recording’ is commercialized”. (with translation in English) [[File:11_Asahi_Shimbun_2005.pdf]] . Shun-ichi Iwasaki, “Perpendicular Magnetic Recording –Its Development and Realization-,“ Proceedings of the Japan Academy Series B, vol 85, no. 2, pp. 37-54, Feb. 2009. [[File:12_Iwasaki_2009.pdf]] . An IDC infographic, “Where in the world is storage”, 2013. Source: http://www.emc.com/leadership/digital-universe/index.htm [[File:13_IDC_infographic_243338.pdf]] . Yoichiro Tanaka, Hiroaki Muraoka, Shun-ichi Iwasaki, “Perpendicular Magnetic Recording; from invention to commercialization,” The 5th History of Electro-Technology Conference (HISTELCON 2017) A1-3, Aug. 7, 2017. [[File:14_Tanaka_2017_Histelcon.pdf]] Supporting materials (supported formats: GIF, JPEG, PNG, PDF, DOC) which can be made publicly available on the IEEE History Center’s website (i.e. unencumbered by copyright, or with the copyright holder’s permission). All supporting materials must be in English, or if not in English, accompanied by an English translation. You must supply the texts or excerpts themselves, not just the references. Images and photographs are especially appreciated, however, it is necessary that you list the copyright owner for these and obtain the copyright owner’s permission to reuse. For documents that are copyright-encumbered, or which you do not have rights to post, email the documents themselves to firstname.lastname@example.org. Please see the Milestone Program Guidelines for more information. To add attachments, first upload the file and add by adding the text: [[Media:(filename)]] For example, if the file you uploaded was named "Milestone Reference.pdf", include the text: [[Media:Milestone Reference.pdf]] in the appropriate field. Please email a jpeg or PDF a letter in English, or with English translation, from the site owner(s) giving permission to place IEEE milestone plaque on the property, and a letter (or forwarded email) from the appropriate Section Chair supporting the Milestone application to email@example.com with the subject line "Attention: Milestone Administrator." Note that there are multiple texts of the letter depending on whether an IEEE organizational unit other than the section will be paying for the plaque(s). Submit this proposal to the IEEE History Committee for review. Only check this when the proposal is finished Summary: This is a minor edit Watch this page Cancel Retrieved from "http://ieeemilestones.ethw.org/Milestone-Proposal:Perpendicular_Magnetic_Recording"