Edit Proposal: Milestone-Proposal:Commercialization of Multi-Layer Ceramic Capacitors with Nickel electrode (Ni-MLCCs), 1982. You do not have permission to edit this page, for the following reason: You are not currently logged in. The action you have requested is limited to users in the group: Users. Please log in or create an account. Docket ID: (admins only) Thank you for proposing a technical achievement for possible recognition as an IEEE Milestone in Electrical Engineering and Computing. Your efforts help preserve the heritage of technology. Detailed information on the Milestone application process may be found at: Milestone Guidelines and How to Propose a Milestone. At least one of the proposer(s) must be an IEEE Member (including Student Member) in good standing. To the proposer’s knowledge, is this achievement subject to litigation? If the answer is "yes", the proposal cannot proceed further. Yes No You must be able to answer "yes" to all of the following questions. If the answer to any of the following questions is "no", the proposal cannot proceed further. Contact us at firstname.lastname@example.org if you are unable to answer "yes" to all of the following and would still like to proceed. Is the achievement you are proposing more than 25 years old? Yes No Is the achievement you are proposing within IEEE’s designated fields as defined by IEEE Bylaw I-104.11, namely: Engineering, Computer Sciences and Information Technology, Physical Sciences, Biological and Medical Sciences, Mathematics, Technical Communications, Education, Management, and Law and Policy. Yes No Did the achievement provide a meaningful benefit for humanity? Yes No Was it of at least regional importance? Yes No Has an IEEE Organizational Unit agreed to pay for the milestone plaque(s)? Yes No Has an IEEE Organizational Unit agreed to arrange the dedication ceremony? Yes No Has the IEEE Section in which the milestone is located agreed to take responsibility for the plaque after it is dedicated? Yes No Has the owner of the site given permission to place an IEEE plaque? Yes No Year or range of years in which the achievement occurred: Title of the proposed milestone. (Include date or date range in title. Example: “Alternating Current Electrification, 1886”) Please provide a plaque citation in English summarizing the achievement and its significance. Text absolutely limited by plaque dimensions to 70 words; 60 is preferable for aesthetic reasons. NOTE: The IEEE History Committee shall have final determination on the wording of the citation. Names of living persons are not normally used in citations. Exceptions to this are cases where the person's name is linked to the achievement itself (e.g. the Lempel-Ziv algorithm, Maxwell's Equations, etc.) or where the person's name is so widely recognizeable to the general public that it makes sense to use it. When used, the names should be the names of the engineers, scientists, or technologists who actually made the achievement, rather than managers or executives. For more information and suggestions about writing milestone citations, please visit Helpful Hints on Citations, Plaque Locations. Murata Manufacturing Co., Ltd. commercialized Ni-MLCCs in 1982, and became the world’s leading manufacturer. Innovations in capacitance enhancement, product miniaturization, and cost reduction, helped the annual worldwide production of Ni-MLCCs reach the level of 3 trillion. Ni-MLCCs' usefulness in computer/communication devices, industrial/medical equipment, and home appliances made Ni-MLCC vital elements in electronics components. . . In what IEEE section(s) will the milestone plaque(s) reside? Please specify the IEEE Organizational Unit(s) which have agreed to sponsor the Milestone, and supply name and contact information for the senior officer from those OU(s). Sponsorship has three aspects: 1) Payment for the cost of the plaque(s), 2) Arranging the dedication ceremony, and 3) agreeing to monitor the plaque and to let IEEE History Center staff know in case the plaque needs to be moved, is no longer secure, etc. Number 3 must be done by the IEEE Section(s) in which the plaque(s) is located, but aspects 1 and 2 can be done by any IEEE Organizational Unit, and they need not be the same one. Please note: your email address and contact information will be masked on the website for privacy reasons. Only IEEE History Center Staff will be able to view the email address. IEEE Organizational Unit(s) paying for milestone plaque(s) Unit: Senior Officer Name: E-mail: Unit: Senior Officer Name: E-mail: IEEE Organizational Unit(s) arranging the dedication ceremony Unit: Senior Officer Name: E-mail: Unit: Senior Officer Name: E-mail: IEEE section(s) monitoring the plaque IEEE Section: IEEE Section Chair name: IEEE Section Chair e-mail: IEEE Section: IEEE Section Chair name: IEEE Section Chair e-mail: Milestone proposer(s) Proposer name: Proposer email: Proposer name: Proposer email: Street address(es) and GPS coordinates of the intended milestone plaque site(s). Please include coordinates in decimal format rather than degrees. What is the intended site(s) of the milestone plaque(s) relation to the achievement? The intended site(s) must have a direct connection with the achievement (e.g. where developed, invented, tested, demonstrated, installed, or operated, etc.). A museum where a device or example of the technology is displayed, or the university where the inventor studied, are not, in themselves, sufficient connection for a milestone plaque. Also, please Describe briefly the intended site(s) of the milestone plaque(s). (e.g. Is it corporate buildings? Historic Site? Residential? Are there other historical markers already at the site?) Are the original buildings extant? Please provide the details of the mounting, i.e. on the outside of the building, in the ground floor entrance hall, on a plinth on the grounds, etc. How is the intended plaque site protected/secured, and in what ways is it accessible to the public? If visitors to the plaque site will need to go through security, or make an appointment, please give details as well as the contact information visitors will need in order to arrange to visit the plaque. Who is the present owner of the site(s)? In the space below, please describe in detail: the historic significance of the achievement, its importance to the evolution of electrical and computer engineering and science, its importance to regional/national/international development, its benefits to humanity, the ways the achievement was a significant advance rather than an incremental improvement of existing technology. The material submitted here will constitute the main descriptive article on the ETHW website for readers to learn about the milestone. Space is unlimited, and detail is encouraged. Most milestones require 1000 to 1500 words of support, however there is no word limit. The article should be readable by a wide audience that includes practicing engineers, scholars of history, and the general public. Some examples of the text of good milestone articles are First Radio Astronomical Observations Using Very Long Baseline Interferometry] and G3_Facsimile International Standardization of G3 Facsimile (Do not worry about the formatting of the page, IEEE History Center Staff will do that afterwards.) What is the historical significance of the work (its technological, scientific, or social importance)? The historical significance of Murata’s commercialization of Ni-MLCCs is briefed as follows. 1. Historical background of Murata’s commercialization of Ni-MLCCs: Presently, multilayer ceramic capacitors (MLCCs) are made of alternating layers of dielectric ceramics and metallic inner electrodes, whose capacitance density, together with those of the traditional monolayer disc/tube-type ceramic capacitors, has been changing as shown in Fig. 1. The annual worldwide production of MLCCs has reached the level of 3 trillion, most of which are produced with base metal electrodes (cf. mainly made of Ni [nickel]), because in comparison with the conventional noble metal electrodes (cf. mainly made of Pt [platinum], Pd [palladium], or Ag[silver]-Pd [i.e. Ag70Pd30 alloy]) cost savings can be greatly obtained, using much cheaper base metal electrodes in MLCCs [1, 2]. Recently the worldwide share of Murata’s Ni-MLCCs has reached 43%. Historically, in addition to the discovery of the barium titanate (BaTiO3) ceramics in the middle 1940s, the progress of the surface mount technology triggered the development of a series of MLCCs in the late 1960s through the early 1970s. At this early stage the electrodes of MLCCs were made of noble metals, such as Pt, Pd, Ag-Pd, etc., since when heated in air they were hard to be oxidized and hence did not lose their electrical conductivities. Although the MLCCs with Ag-Pd electrodes were the cheapest of all MLCCs, the material prices of both Ag and Pd were skyrocketing due to the 1973 oil crisis, and hence it became evident that the utilization of much cheaper base metals of Ni for the electrodes would greatly reduce the production expenses of MLCCs. However, there was a big drawback in using Ni for the electrodes, such that when co-fired with the dielectrics in air the Ni electrodes were oxidized and lost their electrical conductivity. Thus, in 1974 Murata intended to seek a solution for developing new dielectrics to compose MLCCs with Ni electrodes . 2. Development of new MLCCs with BaTiO3-based dielectrics and Ni electrodes: The remarkable progress of the surface mount technology accelerated the industrial demands for MLCCs with Ag-Pd electrodes in the early 1970s, for which the material pricess of both Ag and Pd soared sharply due to the 1973 oil crisis. Thus, in 1974 Murata focused on a cheaper base metals of Ni in substitution for the Ag-Pd electrode, and started the search for dielectrics to compose MLCCs with Ni electrodes. A major problem of using Ni for the electrodes was that the MLCCs had to be sintered in reducing atmospheres to protect Ni from oxidation. Although efforts to accomplish this substitution of Ni for Ag-Pd had been made for years, the first successful realization of the MLCCs with Ni electrodes at significant production rates was achieved by Murata in the early 1980s . Specifically, it was found that the use of Ca-doped, BaTiO3-based dielectrics allowed the MLCCs to be sintered in reducing atmospheres compatible with Ni electrodes [2, 3, 4]. Confirming that the new dielectrics exhibited their excellent insulating property even if co-fired with Ni electrodes, in 1982 Murata embarked on the mass production of the new MLCCs with BaTiO3-based dielectrics and Ni electrodes, usually abbreviated to Ni-MLCCs . 3. Achievements of the commercialization of new Ni-MLCCs: Owing to the progress of both the surface mount technology and the miniaturization technology, in 1974 Murata initiated a diligent effort to reduce the dielectric/electrode thickness as well as to augment the number of layers, therefore the capacitance density, of Ni-MLCCs, and eventually achieved the quality improvement of Ni-MLCCs, as can be seen from Fig. 2. Thus, the industrial demands for these Ni-MLCCs grew so drastically that Murata attained the lead in the commercialization of Ni-MLCCs. Thanks to Murata’s outstanding achievements of developing the new Ni-MLCCs, Dr. Yukio Sakabe at Murata won the Fulrath Award from the American Ceramic Association in 1986, and Murata also received the Corporate Technical Achievement Award at the American Ceramic Association’s 100th Annual Meeting in 1998 . What obstacles (technical, political, geographic) needed to be overcome? 1. Obstacle to enhancing the capacitance density of Ni-MLCCs: The oil crisis in 1973 raised the prices of noble metals used for electrodes of MLCCs so radically that Murata had to seek a substitute for the electrodes. Murata soon focused on a much cheaper base metal of Ni to be used for the electrodes. Through persistent efforts spent for years, in the early 1980s Murata managed to find new Ca-doped, BaTiO3-based dielectrics to compose MLCCs with Ni electrodes , which gave birth to longed-for Ni-MLCCs. Through repeated attempts to improve their capacitance characteristics, Murata succeeded in enhancing the capacitance density of Ni-MLCCs as shown in Fig. 2. Eventually, in 1982 Murata could embark on the mass production of the new Ni-MLCCs, 2. Obstacle to maintaining the reliability: The first years of the industrialization of base metal electrodes were characterized by a severe quality crisis. In 1979 the US company Centralab (Milwaukee, USA) launched the manufacture of MLCCs with base metal electrodes, based on Mn[manganese]-acceptor doped (Ba,Ca)(Ti,Zr)O3. Production and sale of these MLCCs had to be stopped rather soon, due to disastrous degradation of the insulation resistance . Motivated by this accident, Murata dedicated immense energy to developing more reliable MLCCs with base metal electrodes. Murata first focused on a base metal of Ni, and concentrated on developing MLCCs with Ni electrodes. Through vigorous efforts dedicated for years, Murata succeeded in developing the new MLCCs, whose BaTiO3-based dielectrics exhibited their excellent insulating property even if co-fired with Ni electrodes. Eventually, Murata’s new Ni-MLCCs could maintain all specific qualities over a validity period. What features set this work apart from similar achievements? There are a number of distinctive features of Murata’s Ni-MLCCs as summarized below. 1. Distinctive properties of the new Ni-MLCCs: Through persistent efforts to reduce the dielectric/electrode thickness as well as to enhance the capacitance density, Murata greatly improved the qualities of Ni-MLCCs as shown in Fig. 2 (e.g. the present capacitor sizes are ranging between 0.25x0.125x0.125 [mm] and 5.7x5.0x5.0 [mm]). Moreover, considering that the material price of Ni became less than 1/1000 of that of Ag-Pd in 2019, it can be seen that Murata has greatly contributed not only to enhancing the capacitance density but also to reducing the production expenses of Ni-MLCCs. 2. Contribution to the miniaturization of electronic components: Owing to consistent efforts to enhance the capacitance density as well as to save the production expenses, as stated above, Murata expanded the applicability of Ni-MLCCs extensively to industrial/medical use as well as deeply to commercial use, such as for home appliances, PCs, cameras, internet devices, mobile terminals, wearable devices, etc. Furthermore, noting that more than 1000 Ni-MLCCs have been incorporated even in a tiny smart phone, it may be safely acknowledged that Murata’s Ni-MLCCs have greatly contributed not only to the saving of fabrication expenses but also to the miniaturization of a great number of electronics components. 3. Contribution to the growth of industrial demands: In 1979 the US company Centralab launched the manufacture of MLCCs with base metal electrodes, which caused a serious accident of disastrous degradation in the insulation resistance, resulting in the production stoppage . In contrast with this company, Murata initiated a massive effort to carry out the project of developing new MLCCs with Ni electrodes, i.e. Ni-MLCCs, in which not only the reduction of the dielectric/electrode thickness but also the enhancement of the capacitance density was pursued to the full extent possible, as can be seen from Fig. 2. Thus, the industrial demands for these Ni-MLCCs grew to such an extent that an immense amount of Murata’s new Ni-MLCCs were embedded vastly in every possible variety of electronics components, until Murata has acquired the global lead in the commercializaation of Ni-MLCCs . Supporting texts and citations to establish the dates, location, and importance of the achievement. You must supply the texts or excerpts themselves, not just the references. Minimum of five (5), but as many as needed to support the milestone, such as patents, contemporary newspaper articles, journal articles, or chapters in scholarly books. At least one of the references must be from a scholarly book or journal article. 'Scholarly' is defined as peer-reviewed, with references, and published. The full reference, in English, must be uploaded, not just the citation. See below section for details on uploading material to the website. All supporting materials must be in English, or accompanied by an English translation. References  D.F.K. Hennings, “Multilayer ceramic capacitors with base metal electrodes”, in Proc. IEEE International Symp. on Applications of Ferroelectrics, pp. 135-138, 2000.  D.M. Smith, “Multilayer ceramic capacitors with base metal electrodes”, in Proc. IEEE International Symp. on Applications of Ferroelectrics, pp. 369-373, 2000.  Y. Sakabe, “Nickel electrode ceramic capacitors”, Electronic Ceramics, vol. 18, pp. 37-42, 1987 (in Japanese).  Y. Sakabe and H. Seno, “Method for making monolithic ceramic capacitor employing non-reducing dielectric ceramic composition”, U.S. Patent 4,115,493, September 19, 1978.  Y. Sakabe, “Development of the multilayer ceramic capacitors with base metal electrodes”, Abstract Book, the American Ceramic Association Society’s 100th Annual Meeting & Exposition, vol. 43, 1998. Appendix Reference  was written in Japanese, for which English summaries are briefed as follows: Considering that as compared with the material prices of Pd and Ag-Pd electrodes of MLCCs, that of Ni electrode was almost 1/700 and 1/300, respectively, in the late 1970s, Murata was firmly convinced that MLCCs with Ni electrodes would extremely reduce the fabrication expenses of MLCCs. After persistent efforts had been made for years to develop new BaTiO3-based dielectrics to be co-fired with Ni electrodes, eventually in 1982 Murata succeeded in embarking on the mass production of the new MLCCs with Ni electrodes. Supporting materials (supported formats: GIF, JPEG, PNG, PDF, DOC) which can be made publicly available on the IEEE History Center’s website (i.e. unencumbered by copyright, or with the copyright holder’s permission). All supporting materials must be in English, or if not in English, accompanied by an English translation. You must supply the texts or excerpts themselves, not just the references. Images and photographs are especially appreciated, however, it is necessary that you list the copyright owner for these and obtain the copyright owner’s permission to reuse. For documents that are copyright-encumbered, or which you do not have rights to post, email the documents themselves to email@example.com. Please see the Milestone Program Guidelines for more information. To add attachments, first upload the file and add by adding the text: [[Media:(filename)]] For example, if the file you uploaded was named "Milestone Reference.pdf", include the text: [[Media:Milestone Reference.pdf]] in the appropriate field. [[Media:Proposal_of_MLCC'.pdf]] Please email a jpeg or PDF a letter in English, or with English translation, from the site owner(s) giving permission to place IEEE milestone plaque on the property, and a letter (or forwarded email) from the appropriate Section Chair supporting the Milestone application to firstname.lastname@example.org with the subject line "Attention: Milestone Administrator." Note that there are multiple texts of the letter depending on whether an IEEE organizational unit other than the section will be paying for the plaque(s). Submit this proposal to the IEEE History Committee for review. Only check this when the proposal is finished Summary: This is a minor edit Watch this page Cancel Retrieved from "http://ieeemilestones.ethw.org/Milestone-Proposal:Commercialization_of_Multi-Layer_Ceramic_Capacitors_with_Nickel_electrode_(Ni-MLCCs),_1982."